It is argued either that consciousness
is different from unconscious processes, therefore independent of
them, or that it is dependent on unconscious processes, therefore
reducible to them. Both premises are true but neither conclusion follows and both are false.
Thus:
consciousness is different but dependent;
difference does not entail independence;
dependence on unconscious processes does not entail identity with them;
consciousness is neither independent nor reducible.
difference does not entail independence;
dependence on unconscious processes does not entail identity with them;
consciousness is neither independent nor reducible.
Consciousness depends on brains which
depend on mostly unconscious bodily and environmental processes. It,
consciousness, is a sensitive interaction whose sensitivity has quantitatively increased until
it was qualitatively transformed from unconscious sensitivity into conscious
sensation. That consciousness involves conscious sensation is a tautology.
However, a non-tautologous definition of consciousness is both impossible and unnecessary. We are
conscious, thus conscious of consciousness.
Consciousness exists only in specific conditions but is not identical with its conditions because
causality is not identity. The objective description of
an observed brain state differs qualitatively from the subjective description of
an experienced mental state. An observed brain is an object of its observer's
consciousness whereas the brain-possessing organism is not only an object but
also a subject of consciousness. A description of its consciousness must refer
to the objects of that consciousness, not just to its brain states. A brain as perceived by a neurologist is not the
world as perceived by the brain's possessor. However, neurology and
psychology, addressing causes and effects, might converge.
Several unconscious processes do not
add up to one conscious process but consciousness emerges from
many neural interactions none of which is individually conscious just as the
quality of liquidity emerges from many water molecules none of which is
individually liquid.
Thesis: emphasis on the difference
between conscious and unconscious processes
encourages dualism.
Antithesis: emphasis on the dependence of consciousness on unconscious processes encourages reductionism.
Synthesis: emphasis on both is dialectical materialism.
Antithesis: emphasis on the dependence of consciousness on unconscious processes encourages reductionism.
Synthesis: emphasis on both is dialectical materialism.
No comments:
Post a Comment